Nissan Micra 1996 vs Nissan Micra 1998
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.0 - 1.3 (petrol) | 1.0 - 1.5 (petrol, diesel) | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 54 - 75 HP | 55 - 75 HP | |
| Torque: | 79 - 103 NM | 79 - 103 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12 - 19.7 seconds | 12 - 19.7 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.8 - 6.3 | 5.2 - 6.6 | |
|
Nissan Micra 1996 petrol engines consumes on average 0.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than Nissan Micra 1998. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.70 m | 3.72 m | |
| Width: | 1.58 m | 1.58 m | |
| Height: | 1.43 m | 1.44 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Nissan Micra 1996 is 2 cm shorter than the Nissan Micra 1998, width is practically the same , while the height of Nissan Micra 1996 is 1 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 206 litres | 206 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
960 litres | 960 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 9.2 meters | 9.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Nissan Micra 1996 is 0.6 metres less than that of the Nissan Micra 1998, which means Nissan Micra 1996 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`295 | ~ 1`314 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | average | average | |
| Average price (€): | 600 | 1000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Nissan Micra has
|
Nissan Micra has
| |