Nissan Micra 1996 vs Kia Picanto 2004
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.0 - 1.3 (petrol) | 1.0 - 1.1 (petrol, diesel) | |
| Both cars are available with petrol engines. Kia Picanto is available also with diesel engines. Diesel engines typically offer better fuel efficiency and higher torque compared to other engine types. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 54 - 75 HP | 62 - 75 HP | |
| Torque: | 79 - 103 NM | 86 - 153 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12 - 19.7 seconds | 15.1 - 17.9 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.8 - 6.3 | 4.2 - 5.8 | |
|
Nissan Micra petrol engines consumes on average 0.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than Kia Picanto. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.70 m | 3.50 m | |
| Width: | 1.58 m | 1.60 m | |
| Height: | 1.43 m | 1.48 m | |
| Nissan Micra is 20 cm longer than the Kia Picanto, 2 cm narrower, while the height of Nissan Micra is 5 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 206 litres | 220 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
960 litres | 882 litres | |
| Despite its longer length, This could mean that the Nissan Micra uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Nissan Micra (by 78 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 9.2 meters | 9.2 meters | |
| Gross weight: | ~ 1`295 kg | ~ 1`348 kg | |
| Net weight: | ~ 800 kg | ~ 971 kg | |
| Load capacity: | ~ 495 kg | ~ 377 kg | |
| Nissan Micra load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 24 procentiem more than Kia Picanto. Therefore, Nissan Micra is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | |||
| Quality: | average | below average | |
| Average price (€): | 600 | 1200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Nissan Micra has
|
Kia Picanto has
| |