Nissan Micra 1996 vs Kia Picanto 2004
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.0 - 1.3 (petrol) | 1.0 - 1.1 (petrol, diesel) | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 54 - 75 HP | 62 - 75 HP | |
| Torque: | 79 - 103 NM | 86 - 153 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12 - 19.7 seconds | 15.1 - 17.9 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.8 - 6.3 | 4.2 - 5.8 | |
|
Nissan Micra petrol engines consumes on average 0.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than Kia Picanto. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.70 m | 3.50 m | |
| Width: | 1.58 m | 1.60 m | |
| Height: | 1.43 m | 1.48 m | |
| Nissan Micra is 20 cm longer than the Kia Picanto, 2 cm narrower, while the height of Nissan Micra is 5 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 206 litres | 220 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
960 litres | 882 litres | |
| Despite its longer length, Nissan Micra has 14 litres less trunk space than the Kia Picanto. This could mean that the Nissan Micra uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Nissan Micra (by 78 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 9.2 meters | 9.2 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`295 | ~ 1`348 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Quality: | average | below average | |
| Average price (€): | 600 | 1400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Nissan Micra has
|
Kia Picanto has
| |