Nissan Micra 1996 vs Honda Civic 2003
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Body: | Hatchback | Coupe | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
| Engines: | 1.0 - 1.3 | 1.7 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 54 - 75 HP | 120 - 125 HP | |
| Torque: | 79 - 103 NM | 152 - 154 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12 - 19.7 seconds | 9.6 - 11.1 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.8 - 6.3 | 6.8 - 7.3 | |
|
Nissan Micra petrol engines consumes on average 1 litres less fuel per 100 km than Honda Civic. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.70 m | 4.48 m | |
| Width: | 1.58 m | 1.69 m | |
| Height: | 1.43 m | 1.40 m | |
|
Nissan Micra is smaller, but slightly higher. Nissan Micra is 78 cm shorter than the Honda Civic, 11 cm narrower, while the height of Nissan Micra is 3 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 206 litres | 441 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
960 litres | no data | |
|
Honda Civic has more luggage space. Nissan Micra has 235 litres less trunk space than the Honda Civic. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 9.2 meters | 10.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Nissan Micra is 1.6 metres less than that of the Honda Civic, which means Nissan Micra can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`295 | ~ 1`583 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | average | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 600 | 1600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Nissan Micra has
|
Honda Civic has
| |