Nissan Micra 1998 vs Peugeot 106 1996
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Engines: | 1.0 - 1.5 | 1.0 - 1.6 | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 55 - 75 HP | 50 - 118 HP | |
Torque: | 79 - 103 NM | 74 - 145 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12 - 19.7 seconds | 8.7 - 19.2 seconds | |
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.2 - 6.6 | 5.3 - 8.8 | |
Nissan Micra petrol engines consumes on average 1.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than Peugeot 106. On average, Nissan Micra equipped with diesel engines consume 0.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Peugeot 106. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 3.72 m | 3.68 m | |
Width: | 1.58 m | 1.59 m | |
Height: | 1.44 m | 1.38 m | |
Nissan Micra is 4 cm longer than the Peugeot 106, 1 cm narrower, while the height of Nissan Micra is 6 cm higher. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 206 litres | 215 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
960 litres | 953 litres | |
Despite its longer length, Nissan Micra has 9 litres less trunk space than the Peugeot 106. This could mean that the Nissan Micra uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Nissan Micra (by 7 litres). | |||
Turning diameter: | 9.8 meters | 10.6 meters | |
The turning circle of the Nissan Micra is 0.8 metres less than that of the Peugeot 106, which means Nissan Micra can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`314 | ~ 1`328 | |
Safety: | no data | no data | |
Quality: | average | below average | |
Average price (€): | 1000 | 1200 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Nissan Micra has
|
| |