Nissan Micra 1998 vs Nissan Micra 2000
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.0 - 1.5 | 1.0 - 1.5 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 55 - 75 HP | 57 - 82 HP | |
| Torque: | 79 - 103 NM | 80 - 108 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12 - 19.7 seconds | 11.9 - 18.7 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.2 - 6.6 | 5.2 - 6.4 | |
|
Nissan Micra 1998 petrol engines consumes on average 0.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than Nissan Micra 2000. On average, a Nissan Micra 1998 with diesel engines consumes about the same amount of fuel per 100 km as a Nissan Micra 2000. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.72 m | 3.75 m | |
| Width: | 1.58 m | 1.60 m | |
| Height: | 1.44 m | 1.44 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Nissan Micra 1998 is 3 cm shorter than the Nissan Micra 2000, 2 cm narrower the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 206 litres | 206 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
960 litres | 960 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 9.8 meters | 9.8 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`314 | ~ 1`358 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | average | average | |
| Average price (€): | 1000 | 1600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Nissan Micra has
|
Nissan Micra has
| |