Nissan Micra 2005 vs Opel Tigra 2004
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.4 - 1.6 (petrol) | 1.2 - 1.8 (petrol, diesel) | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 88 - 110 HP | 70 - 125 HP | |
| Torque: | 128 - 153 NM | 125 - 170 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.6 - 12.8 seconds | 9.4 - 15.5 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.6 - 6.7 | 4.6 - 7.7 | |
|
Nissan Micra petrol engines consumes on average 0.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than Opel Tigra. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.81 m | 3.92 m | |
| Width: | 1.67 m | 1.68 m | |
| Height: | 1.44 m | 1.36 m | |
|
Nissan Micra is smaller, but higher. Nissan Micra is 11 cm shorter than the Opel Tigra, 1 cm narrower, while the height of Nissan Micra is 8 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 255 litres | 250 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
457 litres | 440 litres | |
| Nissan Micra has 5 litres more trunk space than the Opel Tigra. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Nissan Micra (by 17 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 9.2 meters | 10.7 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Nissan Micra is 1.5 metres less than that of the Opel Tigra, which means Nissan Micra can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`540 | ~ 1`473 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | average | average | |
| Average price (€): | 3000 | 2600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Nissan Micra has
|
Opel Tigra has
| |