Nissan Micra 2005 vs Mazda MX-5 2005

Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison

 
Nissan Micra
2005 - 2009
Mazda MX-5
2005 - 2009
Gearbox: Manual/AutomaticManual/Automatic
Wheel drive type: Front wheel drive (FWD)Rear wheel drive (RWD)
Nissan Micra is available with front wheel drive, while Mazda MX-5 can be equipped with rear wheel drive.
Engines: 1.4 - 1.61.8 - 2.0

Performance

Power: 88 - 110 HP126 - 167 HP
Torque: 128 - 153 NM167 - 190 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 10.6 - 12.8 seconds8.2 - 9.6 seconds
In general, Mazda MX-5 are available with more powerful and dynamic engines than Nissan Micra. Select a car version for a more accurate comparison!

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 6.6 - 6.77.3 - 8.8
Nissan Micra petrol engines consumes on average 1.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than Mazda MX-5.
This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version!
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy.

Dimensions

Length: 3.81 m4.00 m
Width: 1.67 m1.72 m
Height: 1.44 m1.26 m
Nissan Micra is smaller, but higher.
Nissan Micra is 19 cm shorter than the Mazda MX-5, 5 cm narrower, while the height of Nissan Micra is 18 cm higher.
Trunk capacity: 255 litres150 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down, if possible
457 litresno data
Nissan Micra has more luggage capacity.
Even though the car is shorter, The Mazda MX-5 may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers.
Turning diameter: 9.2 meters10 meters
The turning circle of the Nissan Micra is 0.8 metres less than that of the Mazda MX-5, which means Nissan Micra can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight: ~ 1`540 kg~ 1`365 kg
Net weight:~ 1`143 kg~ 1`082 kg
Load capacity:~ 397 kg~ 283 kg
Nissan Micra load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 29 procentiem more than Mazda MX-5. Therefore, Nissan Micra is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads.
Safety: no datano data
Quality:
average

high
Average price (€): 32006200
Pros and Cons: Nissan Micra has
  • lower fuel consumption
  • roomier boot
  • better manoeuvrability
  • higher carrying (cargo) capacity
  • lower price
Mazda MX-5 has
  • more powerful and dynamic engines
  • fewer faults
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv