Nissan Micra 2005 vs Audi TT 1999

Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison

 
Nissan Micra
2005 - 2009
Audi TT
1999 - 2006
Gearbox: Manual/AutomaticManual/Automatic
Wheel drive type: Front wheel drive (FWD)Front wheel drive (FWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4)
Nissan Micra is available only with front wheel drive, while Audi TT can be equipped with front wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive.
Engines: 1.4 - 1.61.8 - 3.2

Performance

Power: 88 - 110 HP150 - 250 HP
Torque: 128 - 153 NM210 - 320 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 10.6 - 12.8 seconds6.4 - 8.9 seconds
In general, Audi TT are available with more powerful and dynamic engines than Nissan Micra. Select a car version for a more accurate comparison!

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 6.6 - 6.78.2 - 11.0
Nissan Micra petrol engines consumes on average 2.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than Audi TT.
This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version!
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy.

Dimensions

Length: 3.81 m4.04 m
Width: 1.67 m1.76 m
Height: 1.44 m1.35 m
Nissan Micra is smaller, but higher.
Nissan Micra is 23 cm shorter than the Audi TT, 9 cm narrower, while the height of Nissan Micra is 9 cm higher.
Trunk capacity: 255 litres220 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down, if possible
457 litres220 litres
Nissan Micra has more luggage capacity.
Even though the car is shorter, The Audi TT may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Nissan Micra (by 237 litres).
Turning diameter: 9.2 meters10 meters
The turning circle of the Nissan Micra is 0.8 metres less than that of the Audi TT, which means Nissan Micra can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight: ~ 1`540 kg~ 1`728 kg
Net weight:~ 1`143 kg~ 1`429 kg
Load capacity:~ 397 kg~ 299 kg
Nissan Micra load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 25 procentiem more than Audi TT. Therefore, Nissan Micra is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads.
Safety: no data
Quality:
average

above average
Average price (€): 32004600
Pros and Cons: Nissan Micra has
  • lower fuel consumption
  • roomier boot
  • better manoeuvrability
  • higher carrying (cargo) capacity
  • lower price
Audi TT has
  • available with 4x4 drive
  • more powerful and dynamic engines
  • fewer faults
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv