Nissan Micra 2000 vs Peugeot 206 2002
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.0 - 1.5 | 1.1 - 2.0 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 57 - 82 HP | 60 - 110 HP | |
| Torque: | 80 - 108 NM | 94 - 240 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.9 - 18.7 seconds | 9.4 - 15.9 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.2 - 6.4 | 4.3 - 7.1 | |
|
Nissan Micra petrol engines consumes on average 0.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than Peugeot 206. On average, Nissan Micra equipped with diesel engines consume 0.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Peugeot 206. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.75 m | 3.82 m | |
| Width: | 1.60 m | 1.65 m | |
| Height: | 1.44 m | 1.43 m | |
|
Nissan Micra is smaller, but slightly higher. Nissan Micra is 7 cm shorter than the Peugeot 206, 5 cm narrower, while the height of Nissan Micra is 1 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 205 litres | 210 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
960 litres | 992 litres | |
| Nissan Micra has 5 litres less trunk space than the Peugeot 206. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Peugeot 206 (by 32 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 9.8 meters | 9.9 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Nissan Micra is 0.1 metres less than that of the Peugeot 206. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`340 | ~ 1`521 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | average | below average | |
| Average price (€): | 800 | 1000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Nissan Micra has
|
Peugeot 206 has
| |