Nissan Micra 2000 vs Seat Ibiza 2002
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.0 - 1.5 | 1.2 - 2.0 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 57 - 82 HP | 64 - 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 80 - 108 NM | 112 - 310 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.9 - 18.7 seconds | 8.4 - 17 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.2 - 6.4 | 4.7 - 7.9 | |
|
Nissan Micra petrol engines consumes on average 0.9 litres less fuel per 100 km than Seat Ibiza. On average, Nissan Micra equipped with diesel engines consume 0.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Seat Ibiza. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.75 m | 3.95 m | |
| Width: | 1.60 m | 1.70 m | |
| Height: | 1.44 m | 1.44 m | |
|
Nissan Micra is smaller. Nissan Micra is 20 cm shorter than the Seat Ibiza, 10 cm narrower the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 205 litres | 265 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
960 litres | 1030 litres | |
|
Seat Ibiza has more luggage space. Nissan Micra has 60 litres less trunk space than the Seat Ibiza. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Seat Ibiza (by 70 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 9.8 meters | 10.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Nissan Micra is 0.8 metres less than that of the Seat Ibiza, which means Nissan Micra can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`340 | ~ 1`648 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Quality: | average | average | |
| Average price (€): | 800 | 1400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Nissan Micra has
|
Seat Ibiza has
| |