Nissan Micra 2000 vs Mazda 2 2003
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.0 - 1.5 | 1.2 - 1.6 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 57 - 82 HP | 68 - 100 HP | |
| Torque: | 80 - 108 NM | 110 - 160 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.9 - 18.7 seconds | 11.4 - 16 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.2 - 6.4 | 4.5 - 7.1 | |
|
Nissan Micra petrol engines consumes on average 0.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than Mazda 2. On average, Nissan Micra equipped with diesel engines consume 0.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mazda 2. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.75 m | 3.92 m | |
| Width: | 1.60 m | 1.68 m | |
| Height: | 1.44 m | 1.54 m | |
|
Nissan Micra is smaller. Nissan Micra is 17 cm shorter than the Mazda 2, 8 cm narrower, while the height of Nissan Micra is 10 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 205 litres | 267 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
960 litres | 1044 litres | |
|
Mazda 2 has more luggage space. Nissan Micra has 62 litres less trunk space than the Mazda 2. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Mazda 2 (by 84 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 9.8 meters | 9.8 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`340 | ~ 1`512 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Quality: | average | high | |
| Average price (€): | 800 | 1400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Nissan Micra has
|
Mazda 2 has
| |