Nissan Micra 2000 vs Ford KA 1997
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nissan Micra is available with both manual and automatic gearboxes, whereas Ford KA is available only with manual gearbox. | |||
| Engines: | 1.0 - 1.5 (petrol, diesel) | 1.3 (petrol) | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 57 - 82 HP | 50 - 70 HP | |
| Torque: | 80 - 108 NM | 97 - 106 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.9 - 18.7 seconds | 14.1 - 17.7 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.2 - 6.4 | 5.9 - 6.7 | |
|
Nissan Micra petrol engines consumes on average 0.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than Ford KA. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.75 m | 3.62 m | |
| Width: | 1.60 m | 1.63 m | |
| Height: | 1.44 m | 1.37 m | |
| Nissan Micra is 13 cm longer than the Ford KA, 3 cm narrower, while the height of Nissan Micra is 7 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 205 litres | 186 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
960 litres | 724 litres | |
| Nissan Micra has 19 litres more trunk space than the Ford KA. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Nissan Micra (by 236 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 9.8 meters | 9.8 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`340 | ~ 1`265 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Quality: | average | low | |
| Average price (€): | 800 | 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Nissan Micra has
|
Ford KA has
| |