Nissan Micra 2003 vs Mercedes A class 2001

Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison

 
Nissan Micra
2003 - 2005
Mercedes A class
2001 - 2004
Gearbox: Manual/AutomaticManual/Automatic
Engines: 1.0 - 1.51.4 - 2.1

Performance

Power: 65 - 88 HP75 - 140 HP
Torque: 90 - 185 NM130 - 205 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 11.9 - 17.9 seconds8.2 - 16.8 seconds
In general, Mercedes A class are available with more powerful and dynamic engines than Nissan Micra. Select a car version for a more accurate comparison!

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 4.5 - 6.84.8 - 8.2
Nissan Micra petrol engines consumes on average 1.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than Mercedes A class. On average, Nissan Micra equipped with diesel engines consume 0.8 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mercedes A class.
This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version!
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy.

Dimensions

Length: 3.72 m3.69 m
Width: 1.66 m1.72 m
Height: 1.54 m1.59 m
Nissan Micra is 3 cm longer than the Mercedes A class, 6 cm narrower, while the height of Nissan Micra is 5 cm lower.
Trunk capacity: 371 litres390 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down, if possible
584 litres1740 litres
Despite its longer length, This could mean that the Nissan Micra uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Mercedes A class (by 1156 litres).
Turning diameter: 9.8 meters11 meters
The turning circle of the Nissan Micra is 1.2 metres less than that of the Mercedes A class, which means Nissan Micra can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight: ~ 1`479 kg~ 1`512 kg
Net weight:~ 976 kg~ 1`085 kg
Load capacity:~ 503 kg~ 427 kg
Nissan Micra load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 15 procentiem more than Mercedes A class. Therefore, Nissan Micra is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads.
Safety: no data
Quality:
average

above average
Average price (€): 12001200
Pros and Cons: Nissan Micra has
  • lower fuel consumption
  • better manoeuvrability
  • higher carrying (cargo) capacity
Mercedes A klase has
  • more powerful and dynamic engines
  • roomier boot
  • fewer faults
  • lower price
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv