Nissan Micra 2003 vs Suzuki Splash 2008
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.0 - 1.5 | 1.0 - 1.2 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 65 - 88 HP | 65 - 94 HP | |
| Torque: | 90 - 185 NM | 90 - 190 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.9 - 17.9 seconds | 12 - 14.9 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.5 - 6.8 | 5.0 - 5.9 | |
|
Nissan Micra petrol engines consumes on average 0.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than Suzuki Splash. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.72 m | 3.72 m | |
| Width: | 1.66 m | 1.68 m | |
| Height: | 1.54 m | 1.59 m | |
| Nissan Micra and Suzuki Splash are practically the same length. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 371 litres | 178 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
584 litres | 1050 litres | |
| Nissan Micra has 193 litres more trunk space than the Suzuki Splash. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Suzuki Splash (by 466 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 9.8 meters | 9.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Nissan Micra is 0.4 metres more than that of the Suzuki Splash, which means Nissan Micra can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`479 | ~ 1`493 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Quality: | average | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 1400 | no data | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Nissan Micra has
|
Suzuki Splash has
| |