Nissan Micra 2003 vs Honda Jazz 2004
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.0 - 1.5 (petrol, diesel) | 1.2 - 1.3 (petrol) | |
| Both cars are available with petrol engines. Nissan Micra is available also with diesel engines. Diesel engines typically offer better fuel efficiency and higher torque compared to other engine types. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 65 - 88 HP | 78 - 83 HP | |
| Torque: | 90 - 185 NM | 110 - 119 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.9 - 17.9 seconds | 12.9 - 14.1 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.5 - 6.8 | 5.5 - 5.8 | |
|
Nissan Micra petrol engines consumes on average 0.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than Honda Jazz. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.72 m | 3.84 m | |
| Width: | 1.66 m | 1.68 m | |
| Height: | 1.54 m | 1.52 m | |
|
Nissan Micra is smaller, but slightly higher. Nissan Micra is 12 cm shorter than the Honda Jazz, 2 cm narrower, while the height of Nissan Micra is 2 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 371 litres | 380 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
584 litres | 1323 litres | |
| Nissan Micra has 9 litres less trunk space than the Honda Jazz. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Honda Jazz (by 739 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 9.8 meters | 9.8 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`479 | ~ 1`465 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Quality: | average | high | |
| Average price (€): | 1400 | 1800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Nissan Micra has
|
Honda Jazz has
| |