Nissan Micra 2005 vs Mercedes A class 2004
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.2 - 1.6 | 1.5 - 2.0 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 65 - 110 HP | 82 - 193 HP | |
| Torque: | 110 - 185 NM | 140 - 300 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.8 - 17.9 seconds | 7.3 - 15.3 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.5 - 6.8 | 4.9 - 7.9 | |
|
Nissan Micra petrol engines consumes on average 0.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than Mercedes A class. On average, Nissan Micra equipped with diesel engines consume 0.8 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mercedes A class. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.72 m | 3.84 m | |
| Width: | 1.66 m | 1.76 m | |
| Height: | 1.54 m | 1.59 m | |
|
Nissan Micra is smaller. Nissan Micra is 12 cm shorter than the Mercedes A class, 10 cm narrower, while the height of Nissan Micra is 5 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 251 litres | 435 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
982 litres | 1370 litres | |
|
Mercedes A class has more luggage space. Nissan Micra has 184 litres less trunk space than the Mercedes A class. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Mercedes A class (by 388 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 9.8 meters | 11 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Nissan Micra is 1.2 metres less than that of the Mercedes A class, which means Nissan Micra can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`486 | ~ 1`809 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | average | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 2000 | 2200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Nissan Micra has
|
Mercedes A klase has
| |