Nissan Micra 2005 vs Ford Fiesta 2005
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.2 - 1.6 | 1.3 - 2.0 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 65 - 110 HP | 68 - 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 110 - 185 NM | 106 - 204 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.8 - 17.9 seconds | 8.4 - 17.3 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.5 - 6.8 | 4.3 - 7.4 | |
|
Nissan Micra petrol engines consumes on average 0.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than Ford Fiesta. On average, Nissan Micra equipped with diesel engines consume 0.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Ford Fiesta. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.72 m | 3.92 m | |
| Width: | 1.66 m | 1.68 m | |
| Height: | 1.54 m | 1.46 m | |
|
Nissan Micra is smaller, but higher. Nissan Micra is 20 cm shorter than the Ford Fiesta, 2 cm narrower, while the height of Nissan Micra is 8 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 251 litres | 284 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
982 litres | 947 litres | |
| Nissan Micra has 33 litres less trunk space than the Ford Fiesta. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Nissan Micra (by 35 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 9.8 meters | 9.8 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`486 | ~ 1`562 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | average | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 2000 | 1600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
|
Ford Fiesta has
| |