Nissan Micra 2005 vs Citroen C2 2003
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.2 - 1.6 | 1.1 - 1.6 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 65 - 110 HP | 61 - 125 HP | |
| Torque: | 110 - 185 NM | 94 - 150 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.8 - 17.9 seconds | 8.9 - 14.4 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.5 - 6.8 | 4.1 - 6.9 | |
|
Nissan Micra petrol engines consumes on average 0.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than Citroen C2. On average, Nissan Micra equipped with diesel engines consume 0.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Citroen C2. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.72 m | 3.67 m | |
| Width: | 1.66 m | 1.66 m | |
| Height: | 1.54 m | 1.46 m | |
| Nissan Micra is 5 cm longer than the Citroen C2, width is practically the same , while the height of Nissan Micra is 8 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 251 litres | 193 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
982 litres | 879 litres | |
|
Nissan Micra has more luggage capacity. Nissan Micra has 58 litres more trunk space than the Citroen C2. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Nissan Micra (by 103 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 9.8 meters | 11.2 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Nissan Micra is 1.4 metres less than that of the Citroen C2, which means Nissan Micra can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`486 | ~ 1`390 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | average | below average | |
| Average price (€): | 2000 | 1200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Nissan Micra has
|
Citroen C2 has
| |