Nissan Micra 2008 vs Ford Fiesta 2008

Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison

 
Nissan Micra
2008 - 2011
Ford Fiesta
2008 - 2012
Gearbox: Manual/AutomaticManual/Automatic
Engines: 1.2 - 1.6 (petrol)1.2 - 1.6 (petrol, diesel)

Performance

Power: 65 - 110 HP60 - 120 HP
Torque: 110 - 200 NM109 - 204 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 9.8 - 17.9 seconds9.9 - 17 seconds
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison!

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 4.7 - 6.84.2 - 6.5
Nissan Micra petrol engines consumes on average 0.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than Ford Fiesta.
This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version!

Dimensions

Length: 3.72 m3.95 m
Width: 1.66 m1.72 m
Height: 1.54 m1.48 m
Nissan Micra is smaller, but higher.
Nissan Micra is 23 cm shorter than the Ford Fiesta, 6 cm narrower, while the height of Nissan Micra is 6 cm higher.
Trunk capacity: 251 litres295 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
982 litres979 litres
Nissan Micra has 44 litres less trunk space than the Ford Fiesta. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Nissan Micra (by 3 litres).
Turning diameter: 9.8 meters10.2 meters
The turning circle of the Nissan Micra is 0.4 metres less than that of the Ford Fiesta.
Gross weight (kg): ~ 1`492~ 1`503
Safety:
Quality:
average

above average
Average price (€): 32003200
Pros and Cons: Nissan Micra has
  • only petrol engines available
Ford Fiesta has
  • petrol and diesel engines available
  • lower fuel consumption for petrol engines
  • roomier boot
  • higher safety
  • fewer faults
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv