Nissan Micra 2008 vs Toyota Aygo 2005
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.2 - 1.6 (petrol) | 1.0 - 1.4 (petrol, diesel) | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 65 - 110 HP | 55 - 68 HP | |
| Torque: | 110 - 200 NM | 93 - 130 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.8 - 17.9 seconds | 14.2 - 16.8 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.7 - 6.8 | 3.8 - 4.2 | |
|
Nissan Micra petrol engines consumes on average 2.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than Toyota Aygo. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.72 m | 3.41 m | |
| Width: | 1.66 m | 1.62 m | |
| Height: | 1.54 m | 1.46 m | |
|
Nissan Micra is larger. Nissan Micra is 31 cm longer than the Toyota Aygo, 4 cm wider, while the height of Nissan Micra is 8 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 251 litres | 139 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
982 litres | 751 litres | |
|
Nissan Micra has more luggage capacity. Nissan Micra has 112 litres more trunk space than the Toyota Aygo. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Nissan Micra (by 231 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 9.8 meters | 9.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Nissan Micra is 0.4 metres more than that of the Toyota Aygo, which means Nissan Micra can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`492 | ~ 1`188 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | average | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 3200 | 1800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Nissan Micra has
|
Toyota Aygo has
| |