Nissan Micra 2000 vs Toyota Starlet 1996
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.0 - 1.5 (petrol, diesel) | 1.3 (petrol) | |
| Both cars are available with petrol engines. Nissan Micra is available also with diesel engines. Diesel engines typically offer better fuel efficiency and higher torque compared to other engine types. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 57 - 82 HP | 75 HP | |
| Torque: | 80 - 108 NM | 115 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.9 - 18.7 seconds | 11.2 - 15 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.2 - 6.4 | 6.8 - 7.8 | |
|
Nissan Micra petrol engines consumes on average 1.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than Toyota Starlet. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.75 m | 3.74 m | |
| Width: | 1.60 m | 1.64 m | |
| Height: | 1.44 m | 1.40 m | |
| Nissan Micra is 1 cm longer than the Toyota Starlet, 4 cm narrower, while the height of Nissan Micra is 4 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 206 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
960 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 9.8 meters | 9.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Nissan Micra is 0.2 metres more than that of the Toyota Starlet. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`358 | ~ 900 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | average | high | |
| Average price (€): | 1600 | 3600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Nissan Micra has
|
Toyota Starlet has
| |