Nissan Micra 2003 vs Nissan Note 2005
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Engines: | 1.2 - 1.5 | 1.4 - 1.6 | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 65 - 88 HP | 68 - 110 HP | |
Torque: | 110 - 185 NM | 128 - 200 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.9 - 17.9 seconds | 10.7 - 16.5 seconds | |
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.5 - 6.8 | 5.1 - 7.0 | |
Nissan Micra petrol engines consumes on average 0.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than Nissan Note. On average, Nissan Micra equipped with diesel engines consume 0.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Nissan Note. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 3.72 m | 4.08 m | |
Width: | 1.66 m | 1.69 m | |
Height: | 1.54 m | 1.55 m | |
Nissan Micra is smaller. Nissan Micra is 36 cm shorter than the Nissan Note, 3 cm narrower, while the height of Nissan Micra is 1 cm lower. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 371 litres | 280 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
584 litres | 1332 litres | |
Even though the car is shorter, Nissan Micra has 91 litres more trunk space than the Nissan Note. The Nissan Note may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Nissan Note (by 748 litres). | |||
Turning diameter: | 9.8 meters | 11 meters | |
The turning circle of the Nissan Micra is 1.2 metres less than that of the Nissan Note, which means Nissan Micra can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`485 | ~ 1`576 | |
Safety: | |||
Quality: | average | average | |
Average price (€): | 1400 | 2200 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Nissan Micra has
|
| |