Nissan Micra 2003 vs Nissan Note 2005

Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison

 
Nissan Micra
2003 - 2005
Nissan Note
2005 - 2009
Gearbox: Manual/AutomaticManual/Automatic
Engines: 1.2 - 1.51.4 - 1.6

Performance

Power: 65 - 88 HP68 - 110 HP
Torque: 110 - 185 NM128 - 200 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 11.9 - 17.9 seconds10.7 - 16.5 seconds
In general, Nissan Note are available with more powerful and dynamic engines than Nissan Micra. Select a car version for a more accurate comparison!

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 4.5 - 6.85.1 - 7.0
Nissan Micra petrol engines consumes on average 0.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than Nissan Note. On average, Nissan Micra equipped with diesel engines consume 0.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Nissan Note.
This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version!
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy.

Dimensions

Length: 3.72 m4.08 m
Width: 1.66 m1.69 m
Height: 1.54 m1.55 m
Nissan Micra is smaller.
Nissan Micra is 36 cm shorter than the Nissan Note, 3 cm narrower, while the height of Nissan Micra is 1 cm lower.
Trunk capacity: 371 litres280 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down, if possible
584 litres1332 litres
Even though the car is shorter, The Nissan Note may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Nissan Note (by 748 litres).
Turning diameter: 9.8 meters11 meters
The turning circle of the Nissan Micra is 1.2 metres less than that of the Nissan Note, which means Nissan Micra can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight: ~ 1`485 kg~ 1`576 kg
Net weight:~ 982 kg~ 1`128 kg
Load capacity:~ 503 kg~ 448 kg
Nissan Micra load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 11 procentiem more than Nissan Note. Therefore, Nissan Micra is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads.
Safety:
Quality:
average

average
Average price (€): 14001600
Pros and Cons: Nissan Micra has
  • lower fuel consumption
  • roomier boot
  • better manoeuvrability
  • higher carrying (cargo) capacity
  • fewer faults
  • lower price
Nissan Note has
  • more powerful and dynamic engines
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv