Nissan Micra 2003 vs Audi A2 2000
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.2 - 1.5 | 1.2 - 1.6 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 65 - 88 HP | 61 - 110 HP | |
| Torque: | 110 - 185 NM | 126 - 230 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.9 - 17.9 seconds | 9.8 - 14.8 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.5 - 6.8 | 2.9 - 5.9 | |
|
Nissan Micra petrol engines consumes on average 0.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than Audi A2. On average, Nissan Micra equipped with diesel engines consume 0.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Audi A2. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.72 m | 3.83 m | |
| Width: | 1.66 m | 1.67 m | |
| Height: | 1.54 m | 1.55 m | |
|
Nissan Micra is smaller. Nissan Micra is 11 cm shorter than the Audi A2, 1 cm narrower, while the height of Nissan Micra is 1 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 371 litres | 390 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
584 litres | 1085 litres | |
| Nissan Micra has 19 litres less trunk space than the Audi A2. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Audi A2 (by 501 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 9.8 meters | 10.3 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Nissan Micra is 0.5 metres less than that of the Audi A2, which means Nissan Micra can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight: | ~ 1`485 kg | ~ 1`452 kg | |
| Net weight: | ~ 982 kg | ~ 1`039 kg | |
| Load capacity: | ~ 503 kg | ~ 413 kg | |
| Nissan Micra load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 18 procentiem more than Audi A2. Therefore, Nissan Micra is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | |||
| Quality: | average | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 1400 | 2600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Nissan Micra has
|
Audi A2 has
| |