Nissan Micra 2010 vs Suzuki Swift 2010
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Engines: | 1.2 (petrol) | 1.2 (petrol, diesel) | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 80 - 98 HP | 75 - 94 HP | |
Torque: | 110 - 142 NM | 118 - 190 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.3 - 14.5 seconds | 12.3 - 13.5 seconds | |
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.1 - 5.4 | 4.2 - 5.6 | |
Nissan Micra petrol engines consumes on average 0.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than Suzuki Swift. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 3.78 m | 3.85 m | |
Width: | 1.67 m | 1.70 m | |
Height: | 1.52 m | 1.51 m | |
Both cars are similar in size. Nissan Micra is 7 cm shorter than the Suzuki Swift, 3 cm narrower the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 265 litres | 204 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1132 litres | no data | |
Nissan Micra has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, Nissan Micra has 61 litres more trunk space than the Suzuki Swift. The Suzuki Swift may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. | |||
Turning diameter: | 9.3 meters | 9.6 meters | |
The turning circle of the Nissan Micra is 0.3 metres less than that of the Suzuki Swift. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`454 | ~ 1`507 | |
Safety: | |||
Suzuki Swift scores higher in safety tests. The Suzuki Swift scores higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
Quality: | below average | average | |
Average price (€): | 4400 | 4000 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Nissan Micra has
|
Suzuki Swift has
| |