Nissan Micra 2010 vs Mercedes A class 2008
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Engines: | 1.2 (petrol) | 1.5 - 2.0 (petrol, diesel) | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 80 - 98 HP | 82 - 193 HP | |
Torque: | 110 - 142 NM | 140 - 300 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.3 - 14.5 seconds | 7.3 - 15.3 seconds | |
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.1 - 5.4 | 4.9 - 7.9 | |
Nissan Micra petrol engines consumes on average 1.8 litres less fuel per 100 km than Mercedes A class. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 3.78 m | 3.88 m | |
Width: | 1.67 m | 1.76 m | |
Height: | 1.52 m | 1.59 m | |
Nissan Micra is smaller. Nissan Micra is 10 cm shorter than the Mercedes A class, 10 cm narrower, while the height of Nissan Micra is 8 cm lower. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 265 litres | 435 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1132 litres | 1370 litres | |
Mercedes A class has more luggage space. Nissan Micra has 170 litres less trunk space than the Mercedes A class. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Mercedes A class (by 238 litres). | |||
Turning diameter: | 9.3 meters | 11 meters | |
The turning circle of the Nissan Micra is 1.7 metres less than that of the Mercedes A class, which means Nissan Micra can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`454 | ~ 1`796 | |
Safety: | no data | ||
Quality: | below average | above average | |
Average price (€): | 4600 | 3800 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Nissan Micra has
|
Mercedes A klase has
| |