Nissan Micra 2010 vs Mercedes A class 2008

Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison

 
Nissan Micra
2010 - 2013
Mercedes A class
2008 - 2011
Gearbox: Manual/AutomaticManual/Automatic
Engines: 1.2 (petrol)1.5 - 2.0 (petrol, diesel)

Performance

Power: 80 - 98 HP82 - 193 HP
Torque: 110 - 142 NM140 - 300 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 11.3 - 14.5 seconds7.3 - 15.3 seconds
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison!

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 4.1 - 5.44.9 - 7.9
Nissan Micra petrol engines consumes on average 1.8 litres less fuel per 100 km than Mercedes A class.
This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version!

Dimensions

Length: 3.78 m3.88 m
Width: 1.67 m1.76 m
Height: 1.52 m1.59 m
Nissan Micra is smaller.
Nissan Micra is 10 cm shorter than the Mercedes A class, 10 cm narrower, while the height of Nissan Micra is 8 cm lower.
Trunk capacity: 265 litres435 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
1132 litres1370 litres
Mercedes A class has more luggage space.
Nissan Micra has 170 litres less trunk space than the Mercedes A class. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Mercedes A class (by 238 litres).
Turning diameter: 9.3 meters11 meters
The turning circle of the Nissan Micra is 1.7 metres less than that of the Mercedes A class, which means Nissan Micra can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg): ~ 1`454~ 1`796
Safety: no data
Quality:
below average

above average
Average price (€): 46003800
Pros and Cons: Nissan Micra has
  • only petrol engines available
  • lower fuel consumption
  • better manoeuvrability
Mercedes A klase has
  • petrol and diesel engines available
  • roomier boot
  • fewer faults
  • lower price
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv