Nissan Micra 2010 vs Suzuki Splash 2012
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.2 | 1.0 - 1.2 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 80 - 98 HP | 68 - 94 HP | |
| Torque: | 110 - 142 NM | 90 - 118 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.3 - 14.5 seconds | 12 - 14.7 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.1 - 5.4 | 4.7 - 5.7 | |
|
Nissan Micra petrol engines consumes on average 0.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than Suzuki Splash. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.78 m | 3.78 m | |
| Width: | 1.67 m | 1.68 m | |
| Height: | 1.52 m | 1.59 m | |
| Nissan Micra and Suzuki Splash are practically the same length. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 265 litres | 202 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1132 litres | 573 litres | |
|
Nissan Micra has more luggage capacity. Nissan Micra has 63 litres more trunk space than the Suzuki Splash. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Nissan Micra (by 559 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 9.3 meters | 9.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Nissan Micra is 0.1 metres less than that of the Suzuki Splash. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`454 | ~ 1`485 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | below average | high | |
| Average price (€): | 4400 | no data | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Nissan Micra has
|
Suzuki Splash has
| |