Nissan Micra 2010 vs Nissan Micra 2013
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.2 | 1.2 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 80 - 98 HP | 80 - 98 HP | |
| Torque: | 110 - 142 NM | 110 - 142 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.3 - 14.5 seconds | 11.3 - 14.5 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.1 - 5.4 | 4.1 - 5.4 | |
|
On average, the Nissan Micra 2010 petrol engines consume nearly the same amount of fuel per 100 km as Nissan Micra 2013. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.78 m | 3.78 m | |
| Width: | 1.67 m | 1.67 m | |
| Height: | 1.52 m | 1.52 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Nissan Micra 2010 and Nissan Micra 2013 are practically the same length. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 265 litres | 265 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1132 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 9.3 meters | 9.3 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`454 | ~ 1`454 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | below average | below average | |
| Average price (€): | 4600 | 7000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Nissan Micra has
|
| |