Nissan Micra 2010 vs Honda Jazz 2011
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.2 | 1.2 - 1.3 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 80 - 98 HP | 90 - 102 HP | |
| Torque: | 110 - 142 NM | 114 - 127 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.3 - 14.5 seconds | 11.4 - 12.6 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.1 - 5.4 | 4.5 - 5.5 | |
|
Nissan Micra petrol engines consumes on average 0.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than Honda Jazz. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.78 m | 3.90 m | |
| Width: | 1.67 m | 1.70 m | |
| Height: | 1.52 m | 1.53 m | |
|
Nissan Micra is smaller. Nissan Micra is 12 cm shorter than the Honda Jazz, 3 cm narrower, while the height of Nissan Micra is 1 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 265 litres | 337 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1132 litres | 883 litres | |
| Nissan Micra has 72 litres less trunk space than the Honda Jazz. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Nissan Micra (by 249 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 9.3 meters | 10.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Nissan Micra is 1.5 metres less than that of the Honda Jazz, which means Nissan Micra can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`454 | ~ 1`581 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Honda Jazz scores higher in safety tests. The Honda Jazz scores higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
| Quality: | below average | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 4400 | 5400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Nissan Micra has
|
Honda Jazz has
| |