Nissan Micra 2010 vs Fiat 500 2012
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.2 (petrol) | 0.9 - 1.6 (petrol, diesel) | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 80 - 98 HP | 85 - 105 HP | |
| Torque: | 110 - 142 NM | 127 - 320 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.3 - 14.5 seconds | 11.3 - 15.1 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.1 - 5.4 | 4.0 - 6.2 | |
|
Nissan Micra petrol engines consumes on average 0.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than Fiat 500. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.78 m | 4.15 m | |
| Width: | 1.67 m | 1.78 m | |
| Height: | 1.52 m | 1.66 m | |
|
Nissan Micra is smaller. Nissan Micra is 37 cm shorter than the Fiat 500, 12 cm narrower, while the height of Nissan Micra is 14 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 265 litres | 343 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1132 litres | no data | |
|
Fiat 500 has more luggage space. Nissan Micra has 78 litres less trunk space than the Fiat 500. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 9.3 meters | 11.1 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Nissan Micra is 1.8 metres less than that of the Fiat 500, which means Nissan Micra can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`454 | no data | |
| Safety: | |||
| Nissan Micra scores higher in safety tests, but Fiat 500 is better rated in child safety tests. The Nissan Micra scores significantly higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
| Quality: | below average | low | |
| Average price (€): | 4400 | 9600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Nissan Micra has
|
Fiat 500 has
| |