Nissan Micra 2013 vs Ford Fiesta 2012
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.2 (petrol) | 1.0 - 1.6 (petrol, diesel) | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 80 - 98 HP | 65 - 125 HP | |
| Torque: | 110 - 142 NM | 150 - 200 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.3 - 14.5 seconds | 9.4 - 16.8 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.1 - 5.4 | 3.3 - 5.9 | |
|
Nissan Micra petrol engines consumes on average 0.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than Ford Fiesta. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.78 m | 3.95 m | |
| Width: | 1.67 m | 1.72 m | |
| Height: | 1.52 m | 1.48 m | |
|
Nissan Micra is smaller, but slightly higher. Nissan Micra is 17 cm shorter than the Ford Fiesta, 6 cm narrower, while the height of Nissan Micra is 3 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 265 litres | 295 litres | |
|
Ford Fiesta has more luggage space. Nissan Micra has 30 litres less trunk space than the Ford Fiesta. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 9.3 meters | 10.2 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Nissan Micra is 0.9 metres less than that of the Ford Fiesta, which means Nissan Micra can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`454 | ~ 1`506 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | below average | average | |
| Average price (€): | 6200 | 4600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Nissan Micra has
|
Ford Fiesta has
| |