Nissan Leaf 2013 vs Mazda 3 2013
| Comparing electrical vehicle (EV) with combustion engine (ICE) one is a complex task, but we are doing our best. | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
| Engine: | Electric | 2.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 109 HP | 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 250 NM | 210 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.5 seconds | 9 seconds | |
|
Mazda 3 is a more dynamic driving. Nissan Leaf engine produces 41 HP less power than Mazda 3, but torque is 40 NM more than Mazda 3. Due to the lower power, Nissan Leaf reaches 100 km/h speed 2.5 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Consumption: | 15.0 kWh/100km | 6.2 l/100km | |
| Fuel cost per 100km: | 4.50 € at€/kWh | 10.90 € at€/l | |
| Change fuel prices per unit to adjust the calculation to the fuel prices in your country. | |||
| Range per fill-up: | 250 km in combined cycle | 820 km in combined cycle | |
| Ground clearance: | 160 mm (6.3 inches) | 155 mm (6.1 inches) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.45 m | 4.47 m | |
| Width: | 1.77 m | 1.80 m | |
| Height: | 1.55 m | 1.45 m | |
|
Nissan Leaf is smaller, but higher. Nissan Leaf is 2 cm shorter than the Mazda 3, 3 cm narrower, while the height of Nissan Leaf is 10 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 370 litres | 364 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
720 litres | 1263 litres | |
| Even though the car is shorter, Nissan Leaf has 6 litres more trunk space than the Mazda 3. The Mazda 3 may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Mazda 3 (by 543 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.4 meters | 10.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Nissan Leaf is 0.2 metres less than that of the Mazda 3. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`945 | 1`835 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 8400 | 7600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
|
Mazda 3 has
| |