Nissan Leaf 2013 vs Mazda 3 2011
Comparing electrical vehicle (EV) with combustion engine (ICE) one is a complex task, but we are doing our best. | |||
---|---|---|---|
Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
Engine: | Electric | 1.6 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 109 HP | 105 HP | |
Torque: | 250 NM | 145 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.5 seconds | 12.2 seconds | |
Nissan Leaf is more dynamic to drive. Nissan Leaf engine produces 4 HP more power than Mazda 3, whereas torque is 105 NM more than Mazda 3. Thanks to more power Nissan Leaf reaches 100 km/h speed 0.7 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Consumption: | 15.0 kWh/100km | 6.4 l/100km | |
Fuel cost per 100km: | 4.50 € at€/kWh | 10.30 € at€/l | |
Change fuel prices per unit to adjust the calculation to the fuel prices in your country. | |||
Range per fill-up: | 250 km in combined cycle | 850 km in combined cycle | |
Ground clearance: | 160 mm (6.3 inches) | 155 mm (6.1 inches) | |
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.45 m | 4.46 m | |
Width: | 1.77 m | 1.76 m | |
Height: | 1.55 m | 1.45 m | |
Nissan Leaf is 2 cm shorter than the Mazda 3, 2 cm wider, while the height of Nissan Leaf is 10 cm higher. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 370 litres | 340 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
720 litres | 1360 litres | |
Even though the car is shorter, Nissan Leaf has 30 litres more trunk space than the Mazda 3. The Mazda 3 may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Mazda 3 (by 640 litres). | |||
Turning diameter: | 10.4 meters | 10.4 meters | |
Gross weight (kg): | 1`945 | 1`770 | |
Safety: | no data | no data | |
Quality: | no data | high | |
Average price (€): | 8400 | 5000 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Nissan Leaf has
|
Mazda 3 has
| |