Nissan Leaf 2017 vs Mazda 3 2016

Comparing electrical vehicle (EV) with combustion engine (ICE) one is a complex task, but we are doing our best.
Nissan Leaf
2017 -
Mazda 3
2016 - 2019
Gearbox: AutomaticAutomatic
Engine: Electric1.5 Diesel

Performance

Power: 150 HP105 HP
Torque: 320 NM270 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 7.9 seconds11.6 seconds
Nissan Leaf is more dynamic to drive.
Nissan Leaf engine produces 45 HP more power than Mazda 3, whereas torque is 50 NM more than Mazda 3. Thanks to more power Nissan Leaf reaches 100 km/h speed 3.7 seconds faster.

Fuel consumption

Consumption: 20.6 kWh/100km4.4 l/100km
Fuel cost per 100km: 6.20 € at€/kWh 6.70 € at€/l
Change fuel prices per unit to adjust the calculation to the fuel prices in your country.
Range per fill-up: 324 km in combined cycle1150 km in combined cycle
Ground clearance: 155 mm (6.1 inches)155 mm (6.1 inches)

Dimensions

Length: 4.48 m4.47 m
Width: 1.79 m1.80 m
Height: 1.54 m1.45 m
Nissan Leaf is 1 cm longer than the Mazda 3, 1 cm narrower, while the height of Nissan Leaf is 9 cm higher.
Trunk capacity: 435 litres364 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
1161 litres1263 litres
Nissan Leaf has 71 litres more trunk space than the Mazda 3. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Mazda 3 (by 102 litres).
Turning diameter: 11.4 meters10.6 meters
The turning circle of the Nissan Leaf is 0.8 metres more than that of the Mazda 3, which means Nissan Leaf can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg): 1`9951`900
Safety: no data
Quality: no data
average
Average price (€): 16 20010 400
Pros and Cons: Nissan Leaf has
  • more power
  • more dynamic
  • roomier boot
Mazda 3 has
  • more mileage per fill-up
  • better manoeuvrability
  • lower price
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv