Nissan Evalia (NV200) 2011 vs Ford Galaxy 2006
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.6 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 110 HP | 145 HP | |
| Torque: | 153 NM | 190 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 11.2 seconds | |
| Nissan Evalia (NV200) engine produces 35 HP less power than Ford Galaxy, whereas torque is 37 NM less than Ford Galaxy. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.3 | 8.2 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 8.4 l/100km | 8.9 l/100km | |
|
The Nissan Evalia (NV200) is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Nissan Evalia (NV200) consumes 0.9 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Ford Galaxy, which means that by driving the Nissan Evalia (NV200) over 15,000 km in a year you can save 135 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Nissan Evalia (NV200) consumes 0.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Ford Galaxy. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 70 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 820 km in combined cycle | 850 km in combined cycle | |
| 710 km with real consumption | 780 km with real consumption | ||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.40 m | 4.82 m | |
| Width: | 1.70 m | 1.85 m | |
| Height: | 1.86 m | 1.72 m | |
|
Nissan Evalia (NV200) is smaller, but higher. Nissan Evalia (NV200) is 42 cm shorter than the Ford Galaxy, 16 cm narrower, while the height of Nissan Evalia (NV200) is 14 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 308 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`980 | 1`100 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | below average | |
| Average price (€): | no data | 4200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Nissan Evalia (NV200) has
|
Ford Galaxy has
| |