Nissan Evalia (NV200) 2011 vs Suzuki Grand Vitara 2005
| Body: | Minivan / MPV | Crossover / SUV | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Crossovers and SUVs have better off-road capabilities (higher ground clearance, can have 4x4 drive), they are preferable for driving on unpaved roads and rural areas. Also, the driver's seating position is higher in a crossover or SUVs, which provides better visibility also in city. This usually comes at the cost of higher fuel consumption, increased weight and higher maintenance costs. | |||
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
| Engine: | 1.6 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 110 HP | 140 HP | |
| Torque: | 153 NM | 183 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 12.5 seconds | |
| Nissan Evalia (NV200) engine produces 30 HP less power than Suzuki Grand Vitara, whereas torque is 30 NM less than Suzuki Grand Vitara. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.3 | 9.1 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 8.4 l/100km | 10.3 l/100km | |
|
The Nissan Evalia (NV200) is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Nissan Evalia (NV200) consumes 1.8 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Suzuki Grand Vitara, which means that by driving the Nissan Evalia (NV200) over 15,000 km in a year you can save 270 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Nissan Evalia (NV200) consumes 1.9 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Suzuki Grand Vitara. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 66 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 820 km in combined cycle | 720 km in combined cycle | |
| 950 km on highway | 860 km on highway | ||
| 710 km with real consumption | 640 km with real consumption | ||
| Nissan Evalia (NV200) gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 20 years | 27 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 8 other car models, including Nissan Qashqai, Nissan Almera, Nissan Juke, Nissan Note, Nissan Micra | Used also on Suzuki SX4 | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
| Nissan Evalia (NV200) 2011 1.6 engine: A simple and reliable engine, not particularly demanding on fuel quality. Tends to consume more oil, may have problems starting in cold weather. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.40 m | 4.47 m | |
| Width: | 1.70 m | 1.81 m | |
| Height: | 1.86 m | 1.70 m | |
|
Nissan Evalia (NV200) is smaller, but higher. Nissan Evalia (NV200) is 7 cm shorter than the Suzuki Grand Vitara, 12 cm narrower, while the height of Nissan Evalia (NV200) is 17 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 398 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1951 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 11 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Nissan Evalia (NV200) is 0.4 metres less than that of the Suzuki Grand Vitara, which means Nissan Evalia (NV200) can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`980 | 2`070 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | above average | |
| Average price (€): | no data | 3200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Nissan Evalia (NV200) has
|
Suzuki Grand Vitara has
| |