Nissan Evalia (NV200) 2011 vs Ford Galaxy 2006
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.5 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing chain and belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 110 HP | 140 HP | |
| Torque: | 240 NM | 320 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 10.5 seconds | |
| Nissan Evalia (NV200) engine produces 30 HP less power than Ford Galaxy, whereas torque is 80 NM less than Ford Galaxy. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.5 | 6.5 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.2 l/100km | 7.2 l/100km | |
|
The Nissan Evalia (NV200) is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Nissan Evalia (NV200) consumes 1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Ford Galaxy, which means that by driving the Nissan Evalia (NV200) over 15,000 km in a year you can save 150 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Nissan Evalia (NV200) consumes 1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Ford Galaxy. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 70 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1090 km in combined cycle | 1070 km in combined cycle | |
| 1200 km on highway | 1270 km on highway | ||
| 960 km with real consumption | 970 km with real consumption | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 8 years | 9 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 22 other car models, including Nissan Qashqai, Renault Laguna, Renault Scenic, Dacia Duster, Nissan Juke | Installed on at least 4 other car models, including Ford Focus, Ford Mondeo, Ford C-Max, Ford S-Max | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Nissan Evalia (NV200) might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | no | yes | |
| The Ford Galaxy engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
| Nissan Evalia (NV200) 2011 1.5 engine: The engine has many modifications, is sufficiently common and spare parts are available. The fuel consumption/power ratio is good. The fuel injection system can be a problem and the timing belt change interval ... More about Nissan Evalia (NV200) 2011 1.5 engine Ford Galaxy 2006 2.0 engine: In early production engines, the camshaft timing chain often stretched, requiring timely replacement to avoid potential issues. The fuel system, equipped with piezo injectors, is highly sensitive to fuel ... More about Ford Galaxy 2006 2.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.40 m | 4.82 m | |
| Width: | 1.70 m | 1.85 m | |
| Height: | 1.86 m | 1.72 m | |
|
Nissan Evalia (NV200) is smaller, but higher. Nissan Evalia (NV200) is 42 cm shorter than the Ford Galaxy, 16 cm narrower, while the height of Nissan Evalia (NV200) is 14 cm higher. | |||
| Seats: | 7 seats | 7 seats | |
| Trunk capacity: | 900 litres | 308 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 7 seats: | 900 litres | 308 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
2900 litres | 2325 litres | |
| In 7-seat version Nissan Evalia (NV200) has more luggage space (by 592 litres). The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Nissan Evalia (NV200) (by 575 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | no data | |
| Gross weight: | 2`030 kg | 2`505 kg | |
| Net weight: | 1`431 kg | 1`735 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 599 kg | 770 kg | |
| Nissan Evalia (NV200) load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 29 procentiem less than Ford Galaxy. Therefore, Ford Galaxy is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | below average | |
| Average price (€): | no data | 3000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Nissan Evalia (NV200) has
|
Ford Galaxy has
| |