Nissan Evalia (NV200) 2011 vs Volkswagen Caddy 2010
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.5 Diesel | 1.6 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 90 HP | 102 HP | |
| Torque: | 200 NM | 250 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 12.9 seconds | |
| Nissan Evalia (NV200) engine produces 12 HP less power than Volkswagen Caddy, whereas torque is 50 NM less than Volkswagen Caddy. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.3 | 5.1 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.1 l/100km | 6.4 l/100km | |
|
The Nissan Evalia (NV200) is a better choice in terms of fuel economy based on user-reported consumption, although the specification shows otherwise. By specification Nissan Evalia (NV200) consumes 0.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Caddy, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Nissan Evalia (NV200) could require 30 litres more fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Nissan Evalia (NV200) consumes 0.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Caddy. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1130 km in combined cycle | 1170 km in combined cycle | |
| 1220 km on highway | 1270 km on highway | ||
| 980 km with real consumption | 930 km with real consumption | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 8 years | 6 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 22 other car models, including Nissan Qashqai, Renault Laguna, Renault Scenic, Dacia Duster, Nissan Juke | Used only for this car | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Nissan Evalia (NV200) might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | no | yes | |
| The Volkswagen Caddy engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
| Nissan Evalia (NV200) 2011 1.5 engine: The engine has many modifications, is sufficiently common and spare parts are available. The fuel consumption/power ratio is good. The fuel injection system can be a problem and the timing belt change interval ... More about Nissan Evalia (NV200) 2011 1.5 engine Volkswagen Caddy 2010 1.6 engine: The 1.6 TDI turbo diesel engine is generally reliable, which is especially reassuring given its frequent use in commercial vehicles. Even under heavy use, it can exceed 500,000 km, provided that maintenance is performed regularly and ... More about Volkswagen Caddy 2010 1.6 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.40 m | 4.41 m | |
| Width: | 1.70 m | 1.79 m | |
| Height: | 1.86 m | 1.86 m | |
|
Nissan Evalia (NV200) is smaller, but slightly higher. Nissan Evalia (NV200) and Volkswagen Caddy are practically the same length. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 560 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 3200 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 11.1 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Nissan Evalia (NV200) is 0.5 metres less than that of the Volkswagen Caddy, which means Nissan Evalia (NV200) can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`030 | 2`159 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | below average | |
| Average price (€): | no data | 5600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Nissan Evalia (NV200) has
|
Volkswagen Caddy has
| |