Nissan Evalia (NV200) 2011 vs Ford Galaxy 2006
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nissan Evalia (NV200) is available only with manual gearbox, whereas Ford Galaxy has both automatic and manual transmission options. | |||
| Engines: | 1.5 - 1.6 | 2.0 - 2.3 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 90 - 110 HP | 130 - 161 HP | |
| Torque: | 153 - 240 NM | 190 - 320 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 10.5 - 11.6 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.3 - 7.3 | 6.5 - 8.2 | |
|
Nissan Evalia (NV200) petrol engines consumes on average 0.9 litres less fuel per 100 km than Ford Galaxy. On average, Nissan Evalia (NV200) equipped with diesel engines consume 1.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Ford Galaxy. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.40 m | 4.82 m | |
| Width: | 1.70 m | 1.85 m | |
| Height: | 1.86 m | 1.72 m | |
|
Nissan Evalia (NV200) is smaller, but higher. Nissan Evalia (NV200) is 42 cm shorter than the Ford Galaxy, 16 cm narrower, while the height of Nissan Evalia (NV200) is 14 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 390 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 11.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Nissan Evalia (NV200) is 1 metres less than that of the Ford Galaxy, which means Nissan Evalia (NV200) can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 2`013 | ~ 1`768 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | below average | |
| Average price (€): | no data | 4200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Nissan Evalia (NV200) has
|
Ford Galaxy has
| |