Nissan Evalia (NV200) 2011 vs Suzuki Grand Vitara 2005
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Body: | Minivan / MPV | Crossover / SUV | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Crossovers and SUVs have better off-road capabilities (higher ground clearance, can have 4x4 drive), they are preferable for driving on unpaved roads and rural areas. Also, the driver's seating position is higher in a crossover or SUVs, which provides better visibility also in city. This usually comes at the cost of higher fuel consumption, increased weight and higher maintenance costs. | |||
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual/Automatic | |
| Nissan Evalia (NV200) is available only with manual gearbox, whereas Suzuki Grand Vitara has both automatic and manual transmission options. | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | Rear wheel drive (RWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Nissan Evalia (NV200) is available only with front wheel drive, while Suzuki Grand Vitara can be equipped with rear wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive. | |||
| Engines: | 1.5 - 1.6 | 1.9 - 3.2 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 90 - 110 HP | 129 - 229 HP | |
| Torque: | 153 - 240 NM | 183 - 300 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 9 - 13.6 seconds | |
| In general, Suzuki Grand Vitara are available with more powerful and dynamic engines than Nissan Evalia (NV200). Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.3 - 7.3 | 7.7 - 11.3 | |
|
Nissan Evalia (NV200) petrol engines consumes on average 2.9 litres less fuel per 100 km than Suzuki Grand Vitara. On average, Nissan Evalia (NV200) equipped with diesel engines consume 2.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Suzuki Grand Vitara. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.40 m | 4.47 m | |
| Width: | 1.70 m | 1.81 m | |
| Height: | 1.86 m | 1.70 m | |
|
Nissan Evalia (NV200) is smaller, but higher. Nissan Evalia (NV200) is 7 cm shorter than the Suzuki Grand Vitara, 12 cm narrower, while the height of Nissan Evalia (NV200) is 17 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 900 litres | 691 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
2900 litres | 1951 litres | |
|
Nissan Evalia (NV200) has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, Nissan Evalia (NV200) has 209 litres more trunk space than the Suzuki Grand Vitara. The Suzuki Grand Vitara may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Nissan Evalia (NV200) (by 949 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 11 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Nissan Evalia (NV200) is 0.4 metres less than that of the Suzuki Grand Vitara, which means Nissan Evalia (NV200) can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 2`013 | ~ 2`070 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | above average | |
| Average price (€): | no data | 3400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Nissan Evalia (NV200) has
|
Suzuki Grand Vitara has
| |