Nissan Cube 2008 vs Toyota Urban Cruiser 2008

 
Nissan Cube
2008 - 2019
Toyota Urban Cruiser
2008 - 2014
Body: Minivan / MPVCrossover / SUV
Crossovers and SUVs have better off-road capabilities (higher ground clearance, can have 4x4 drive), they are preferable for driving on unpaved roads and rural areas. Also, the driver's seating position is higher in a crossover or SUVs, which provides better visibility also in city. This usually comes at the cost of higher fuel consumption, increased weight and higher maintenance costs.
Gearbox: Manual/AutomaticAutomatic
Engine: 1.5 Petrol1.5 Petrol
Camshaft drive: Timing chainTiming chain

Performance

Power: 109 HP109 HP
Torque: 148 NM138 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: n/a secondsn/a seconds
Nissan Cube and Toyota Urban Cruiser have the same engine power, but Nissan Cube torque is 10 NM more than Toyota Urban Cruiser.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): no data5.6
Fuel tank capacity: 45 litres42 litres

Engines

Engine production duration: 20 years25 years
Engine spread: Used also on Nissan JukeUsed also on Toyota Yaris
In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Toyota Urban Cruiser might be a better choice in this respect.

Dimensions

Length: 3.89 m3.93 m
Width: 1.70 m1.73 m
Height: 1.67 m1.53 m
Nissan Cube is smaller, but higher.
Nissan Cube is 4 cm shorter than the Toyota Urban Cruiser, 3 cm narrower, while the height of Nissan Cube is 15 cm higher.
Trunk capacity: no datano data
Turning diameter: no datano data
Gross weight (kg): no data1`425
Safety:
Nissan Cube scores higher in safety tests, but Toyota Urban Cruiser is better rated in child safety tests.
Quality: no datano data
Average price (€): 58005200
Pros and Cons: Nissan Cube has
  • higher safety
Toyota Urban Cruiser has
  • higher children safety
  • lower price
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv