Nissan Cube 2008 vs Toyota Urban Cruiser 2008
Body: | Minivan / MPV | Crossover / SUV | |
---|---|---|---|
Crossovers and SUVs have better off-road capabilities (higher ground clearance, can have 4x4 drive), they are preferable for driving on unpaved roads and rural areas. Also, the driver's seating position is higher in a crossover or SUVs, which provides better visibility also in city. This usually comes at the cost of higher fuel consumption, increased weight and higher maintenance costs. | |||
Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Automatic | |
Engine: | 1.5 Petrol | 1.5 Petrol | |
Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 109 HP | 109 HP | |
Torque: | 148 NM | 138 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | n/a seconds | |
Nissan Cube and Toyota Urban Cruiser have the same engine power, but Nissan Cube torque is 10 NM more than Toyota Urban Cruiser. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | no data | 5.6 | |
Fuel tank capacity: | 45 litres | 42 litres | |
Engines | |||
Engine production duration: | 20 years | 25 years | |
Engine spread: | Used also on Nissan Juke | Used also on Toyota Yaris | |
In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Toyota Urban Cruiser might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 3.89 m | 3.93 m | |
Width: | 1.70 m | 1.73 m | |
Height: | 1.67 m | 1.53 m | |
Nissan Cube is smaller, but higher. Nissan Cube is 4 cm shorter than the Toyota Urban Cruiser, 3 cm narrower, while the height of Nissan Cube is 15 cm higher. | |||
Trunk capacity: | no data | no data | |
Turning diameter: | no data | no data | |
Gross weight (kg): | no data | 1`425 | |
Safety: | |||
Nissan Cube scores higher in safety tests, but Toyota Urban Cruiser is better rated in child safety tests. | |||
Quality: | no data | no data | |
Average price (€): | 5800 | 5200 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Nissan Cube has
|
Toyota Urban Cruiser has
| |