Nissan Cube 2008 vs Nissan Pulsar 2015

 
Nissan Cube
2008 - 2019
Nissan Pulsar
2015 - 2018
Body: Minivan / MPVHatchback
Gearbox: Manual/AutomaticManual
Engine: 1.5 Petrol1.6 Petrol
Camshaft drive: Timing chainTiming chain

Performance

Power: 109 HP190 HP
Torque: 148 NM240 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: n/a seconds7.7 seconds
Nissan Cube engine produces 81 HP less power than Nissan Pulsar, whereas torque is 92 NM less than Nissan Pulsar.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): no datano data
Fuel tank capacity: 45 litres46 litres
600 km with real consumption640 km with real consumption
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy.

Engines

Average engine lifespan: 320'000 km300'000 km
Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used.
Engine production duration: 22 years16 years
Engine spread: Used also on Nissan JukeInstalled on at least 3 other car models, including Nissan X-Trail, Nissan Qashqai, Nissan Juke
In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts.

Dimensions

Length: 3.89 m4.39 m
Width: 1.70 m1.77 m
Height: 1.67 m1.52 m
Nissan Cube is smaller, but higher.
Nissan Cube is 50 cm shorter than the Nissan Pulsar, 7 cm narrower, while the height of Nissan Cube is 16 cm higher.
Trunk capacity: no data385 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down, if possible
no data1395 litres
Turning diameter: no data10.2 meters
Gross weight: no data1`785 kg
Safety:
Nissan Pulsar scores higher in safety tests. The Nissan Cube scores significantly higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests.
Quality: no data
average
Average price (€): 54005800
Pros and Cons: Nissan Cube has
  • better safety assist technologies
  • lower price
Nissan Pulsar has
  • more power
  • higher safety
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv