Nissan Cube 2010 vs Nissan Pulsar 2014
| Body: | Minivan / MPV | Hatchback | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
| Engine: | 1.5 Diesel | 1.5 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 110 HP | 110 HP | |
| Torque: | 240 NM | 260 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.9 seconds | 11.5 seconds | |
|
Nissan Pulsar is a more dynamic driving. Nissan Cube and Nissan Pulsar have the same engine power, but Nissan Cube torque is 20 NM less than Nissan Pulsar. Nissan Cube reaches 100 km/h speed 0.4 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.2 | 3.6 | |
|
The Nissan Pulsar is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Nissan Cube consumes 1.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Nissan Pulsar, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Nissan Cube could require 240 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 52 litres | 46 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1000 km in combined cycle | 1270 km in combined cycle | |
| 1100 km on highway | 1390 km on highway | ||
| Nissan Pulsar gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 8 years | 8 years | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.98 m | 4.39 m | |
| Width: | 1.70 m | 1.77 m | |
| Height: | 1.67 m | 1.52 m | |
|
Nissan Cube is smaller, but higher. Nissan Cube is 41 cm shorter than the Nissan Pulsar, 7 cm narrower, while the height of Nissan Cube is 16 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 260 litres | 385 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
1563 litres | 1395 litres | |
| Nissan Cube has 125 litres less trunk space than the Nissan Pulsar. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Nissan Cube (by 168 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.2 meters | 10.2 meters | |
| Gross weight: | 1`820 kg | 1`785 kg | |
| Net weight: | 1`375 kg | 1`270 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 445 kg | 515 kg | |
| Nissan Cube load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 16 procentiem less than Nissan Pulsar. Therefore, Nissan Pulsar is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | |||
| Nissan Pulsar scores higher in safety tests. The Nissan Cube scores significantly higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
| Quality: | no data | average | |
| Average price (€): | 5400 | 5800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Nissan Cube has
|
Nissan Pulsar has
| |