Nissan Cube 2010 vs Ford B-Max 2012
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.5 Diesel | 1.5 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 110 HP | 95 HP | |
| Torque: | 240 NM | 215 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.9 seconds | 13 seconds | |
|
Nissan Cube is more dynamic to drive. Nissan Cube engine produces 15 HP more power than Ford B-Max, whereas torque is 25 NM more than Ford B-Max. Thanks to more power Nissan Cube reaches 100 km/h speed 1.1 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.2 | 3.8 | |
|
The Ford B-Max is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Nissan Cube consumes 1.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Ford B-Max, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Nissan Cube could require 210 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 52 litres | 48 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1000 km in combined cycle | 1260 km in combined cycle | |
| 1100 km on highway | 1330 km on highway | ||
| Ford B-Max gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Nissan Cube 2010 1.5 engine: The engine has many modifications, is sufficiently common and spare parts are available. The fuel consumption/power ratio is good. The fuel injection system can be a problem and the timing belt change interval ... More about Nissan Cube 2010 1.5 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.98 m | 4.08 m | |
| Width: | 1.70 m | 1.75 m | |
| Height: | 1.67 m | 1.60 m | |
|
Nissan Cube is smaller, but higher. Nissan Cube is 10 cm shorter than the Ford B-Max, 6 cm narrower, while the height of Nissan Cube is 7 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 260 litres | 318 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1563 litres | 1386 litres | |
| Nissan Cube has 58 litres less trunk space than the Ford B-Max. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Nissan Cube (by 177 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.2 meters | 10.5 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Nissan Cube is 0.3 metres less than that of the Ford B-Max. | |||
| Power steering: | Hydraulic power steering | Electric power steering | |
| Hydraulic power steering is technologically more complex, louder, increases fuel consumption and requires more servicing. It has the advantages of more power, less strain on the car's electrical system and better feedback (feeling) when steering. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`820 | 1`775 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Ford B-Max scores higher in safety tests. The Nissan Cube scores higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
| Quality: | no data | average | |
| Average price (€): | 5600 | 7200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Nissan Cube has
|
Ford B-Max has
| |