Nissan Cube 2002 vs Suzuki Wagon R+ 2000
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.3 Petrol | 1.3 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 101 HP | 76 HP | |
| Torque: | 123 NM | 115 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 12.8 seconds | |
| Nissan Cube engine produces 25 HP more power than Suzuki Wagon R+, whereas torque is 8 NM more than Suzuki Wagon R+. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.3 | 6.9 | |
|
The Nissan Cube is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Nissan Cube consumes 0.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Suzuki Wagon R+, which means that by driving the Nissan Cube over 15,000 km in a year you can save 90 litres of fuel. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.75 m | 3.50 m | |
| Width: | 1.61 m | 1.62 m | |
| Height: | 1.63 m | 1.70 m | |
| Nissan Cube is 25 cm longer than the Suzuki Wagon R+, 1 cm narrower, while the height of Nissan Cube is 7 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 180 litres | 218 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
no data | 1250 litres | |
|
Suzuki Wagon R+ has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, This could mean that the Nissan Cube uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | no data | 9.8 meters | |
| Gross weight: | 1`355 kg | 1`355 kg | |
| Net weight: | 1`080 kg | 945 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 275 kg | 410 kg | |
| Nissan Cube load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 49 procentiem less than Suzuki Wagon R+. Therefore, Suzuki Wagon R+ is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | no data | 1800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Nissan Cube has
|
Suzuki Wagon R+ has
| |