Nissan Cube 2002 vs Suzuki Wagon R+ 2000
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.3 Petrol | 1.3 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 101 HP | 76 HP | |
| Torque: | 123 NM | 115 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 12.8 seconds | |
| Nissan Cube engine produces 25 HP more power than Suzuki Wagon R+, whereas torque is 8 NM more than Suzuki Wagon R+. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.3 | 6.9 | |
|
The Nissan Cube is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Nissan Cube consumes 0.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Suzuki Wagon R+, which means that by driving the Nissan Cube over 15,000 km in a year you can save 90 litres of fuel. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.75 m | 3.50 m | |
| Width: | 1.61 m | 1.62 m | |
| Height: | 1.63 m | 1.70 m | |
| Nissan Cube is 25 cm longer than the Suzuki Wagon R+, 1 cm narrower, while the height of Nissan Cube is 7 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 180 litres | 218 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1250 litres | |
|
Suzuki Wagon R+ has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Nissan Cube has 38 litres less trunk space than the Suzuki Wagon R+. This could mean that the Nissan Cube uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | no data | 9.8 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`355 | 1`355 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | no data | 1800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Nissan Cube has
|
Suzuki Wagon R+ has
| |