Nissan Cube 2002 vs Mitsubishi Space Star 1998
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.3 Petrol | 1.3 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 101 HP | 86 HP | |
| Torque: | 123 NM | 117 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 13.4 seconds | |
| Nissan Cube engine produces 15 HP more power than Mitsubishi Space Star, whereas torque is 6 NM more than Mitsubishi Space Star. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.3 | 6.8 | |
|
The Nissan Cube is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Nissan Cube consumes 0.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi Space Star, which means that by driving the Nissan Cube over 15,000 km in a year you can save 75 litres of fuel. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.75 m | 4.03 m | |
| Width: | 1.61 m | 1.70 m | |
| Height: | 1.63 m | 1.52 m | |
|
Nissan Cube is smaller, but higher. Nissan Cube is 28 cm shorter than the Mitsubishi Space Star, 9 cm narrower, while the height of Nissan Cube is 11 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 180 litres | 370 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1370 litres | |
|
Mitsubishi Space Star has more luggage space. Nissan Cube has 190 litres less trunk space than the Mitsubishi Space Star. | |||
| Turning diameter: | no data | 9.6 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`355 | 1`655 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | no data | 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Nissan Cube has
|
Mitsubishi Space Star has
| |