Nissan Cube 2002 vs Hyundai Matrix 2004
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.3 Petrol | 1.6 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 101 HP | 103 HP | |
| Torque: | 123 NM | 141 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 12.7 seconds | |
| Nissan Cube engine produces 2 HP less power than Hyundai Matrix, whereas torque is 18 NM less than Hyundai Matrix. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.3 | 8.0 | |
|
The Nissan Cube is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Nissan Cube consumes 1.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Hyundai Matrix, which means that by driving the Nissan Cube over 15,000 km in a year you can save 255 litres of fuel. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.75 m | 4.02 m | |
| Width: | 1.61 m | 1.74 m | |
| Height: | 1.63 m | 1.64 m | |
|
Nissan Cube is smaller. Nissan Cube is 27 cm shorter than the Hyundai Matrix, 13 cm narrower, while the height of Nissan Cube is 1 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 180 litres | 350 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
no data | 1284 litres | |
|
Hyundai Matrix has more luggage space. Nissan Cube has 170 litres less trunk space than the Hyundai Matrix. | |||
| Turning diameter: | no data | no data | |
| Gross weight: | 1`355 kg | 1`800 kg | |
| Net weight: | 1`080 kg | 1`323 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 275 kg | 477 kg | |
| Nissan Cube load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 73 procentiem less than Hyundai Matrix. Therefore, Hyundai Matrix is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | average | |
| Average price (€): | no data | 1000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Nissan Cube has
|
Hyundai Matrix has
| |