Nissan Cube 2002 vs Renault Kangoo 2003
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.4 Petrol | 1.4 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing belt | |
| Engine chain usually needs to be replaced less often than the timing belt, but the cost of replacing the chain is usually higher. Chain motors are considered to be more reliable, but noisier and more vibration generating. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 98 HP | 75 HP | |
| Torque: | 137 NM | 114 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 16.9 seconds | |
| Nissan Cube engine produces 23 HP more power than Renault Kangoo, whereas torque is 23 NM more than Renault Kangoo. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | no data | 7.9 | |
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 11 years | 19 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Nissan Note, Nissan Micra | Used also on Dacia Logan | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.73 m | 4.00 m | |
| Width: | 1.67 m | 1.66 m | |
| Height: | 1.64 m | 1.84 m | |
| Nissan Cube is 27 cm shorter than the Renault Kangoo, 1 cm wider, while the height of Nissan Cube is 20 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 650 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1250 litres | 2600 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 9.4 meters | 10.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Nissan Cube is 1.4 metres less than that of the Renault Kangoo, which means Nissan Cube can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | 1`670 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | low | |
| Average price (€): | no data | 1200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Nissan Cube has
|
Renault Kangoo has
| |