Nissan Cube 2010 vs Toyota Yaris 2007
| Body: | Minivan / MPV | Hatchback | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
| Engine: | 1.6 Petrol | 1.8 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 110 HP | 133 HP | |
| Torque: | 153 NM | 173 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.3 seconds | 9.3 seconds | |
|
Toyota Yaris is a more dynamic driving. Nissan Cube engine produces 23 HP less power than Toyota Yaris, whereas torque is 20 NM less than Toyota Yaris. Due to the lower power, Nissan Cube reaches 100 km/h speed 2 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.6 | 7.2 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.4 l/100km | 7.8 l/100km | |
|
The Nissan Cube is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Nissan Cube consumes 0.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Toyota Yaris, which means that by driving the Nissan Cube over 15,000 km in a year you can save 90 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Nissan Cube consumes 0.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Toyota Yaris. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 52 litres | 42 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 780 km in combined cycle | 580 km in combined cycle | |
| 700 km with real consumption | 530 km with real consumption | ||
| Nissan Cube gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 360'000 km | 350'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 20 years | 19 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 8 other car models, including Nissan Qashqai, Nissan Almera, Nissan Juke, Nissan Note, Nissan Micra | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Toyota Avensis, Toyota Corolla | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Nissan Cube might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | no | yes | |
| The Toyota Yaris engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
| Nissan Cube 2010 1.6 engine: A simple and reliable engine, not particularly demanding on fuel quality. Tends to consume more oil, may have problems starting in cold weather. Toyota Yaris 2007 1.8 engine: This engine is generally considered decent, with a lifespan of around 250,000 km. While it doesn’t cause major issues if properly maintained, some common problems still arise. One of the most frequent ... More about Toyota Yaris 2007 1.8 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.98 m | 3.80 m | |
| Width: | 1.70 m | 1.70 m | |
| Height: | 1.67 m | 1.53 m | |
| Nissan Cube is 18 cm longer than the Toyota Yaris, width is practically the same , while the height of Nissan Cube is 14 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 255 litres | 275 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1563 litres | no data | |
| Despite its longer length, Nissan Cube has 20 litres less trunk space than the Toyota Yaris. This could mean that the Nissan Cube uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.2 meters | 9.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Nissan Cube is 0.8 metres more than that of the Toyota Yaris, which means Nissan Cube can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`700 | 1`050 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Quality: | no data | high | |
| Average price (€): | 5600 | 2000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Nissan Cube has
|
Toyota Yaris has
| |