Nissan Cube 2010 vs Toyota Verso 2010
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.6 Petrol | 1.3 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 110 HP | 99 HP | |
| Torque: | 153 NM | 125 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.3 seconds | 13.3 seconds | |
|
Nissan Cube is more dynamic to drive. Nissan Cube engine produces 11 HP more power than Toyota Verso, whereas torque is 28 NM more than Toyota Verso. Thanks to more power Nissan Cube reaches 100 km/h speed 2 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.6 | 5.4 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.4 l/100km | 6.2 l/100km | |
|
The Toyota Verso is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Nissan Cube consumes 1.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Toyota Verso, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Nissan Cube could require 180 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Nissan Cube consumes 1.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Toyota Verso. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 52 litres | 42 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 780 km in combined cycle | 770 km in combined cycle | |
| 920 km on highway | 870 km on highway | ||
| 700 km with real consumption | 670 km with real consumption | ||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 360'000 km | 280'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Nissan Cube engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 20 years | 17 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 8 other car models, including Nissan Qashqai, Nissan Almera, Nissan Juke, Nissan Note, Nissan Micra | Installed on at least 5 other car models, including Toyota Corolla, Toyota Auris, Toyota Yaris, Toyota iQ | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Nissan Cube might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | no | yes | |
| The Toyota Verso engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
| Nissan Cube 2010 1.6 engine: A simple and reliable engine, not particularly demanding on fuel quality. Tends to consume more oil, may have problems starting in cold weather. Toyota Verso 2010 1.3 engine: The engine is known for its reliability but exhibits several common issues, especially as mileage increases. Owners report minor oil consumption, which tends to grow over time due to piston ring coking. Individual ignition ... More about Toyota Verso 2010 1.3 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.98 m | 3.99 m | |
| Width: | 1.70 m | 1.70 m | |
| Height: | 1.67 m | 1.60 m | |
| Nissan Cube is 1 cm shorter than the Toyota Verso, width is practically the same , while the height of Nissan Cube is 8 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 255 litres | 430 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1563 litres | 623 litres | |
| Nissan Cube has 175 litres less trunk space than the Toyota Verso. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Nissan Cube (by 940 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.2 meters | 10.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Nissan Cube is 0.6 metres less than that of the Toyota Verso, which means Nissan Cube can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`700 | 1`515 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 5600 | 8200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Nissan Cube has
|
Toyota Verso has
| |