Nissan Cube 2010 vs Hyundai ix20 2010
| Body: | Minivan / MPV | Hatchback | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
| Engine: | 1.6 Petrol | 1.6 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 110 HP | 124 HP | |
| Torque: | 153 NM | 156 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.3 seconds | 10.9 seconds | |
|
Hyundai ix20 is a more dynamic driving. Nissan Cube engine produces 14 HP less power than Hyundai ix20, whereas torque is 3 NM less than Hyundai ix20. Due to the lower power, Nissan Cube reaches 100 km/h speed 0.4 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.6 | 5.9 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.4 l/100km | 7.2 l/100km | |
|
The Hyundai ix20 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Nissan Cube consumes 0.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Hyundai ix20, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Nissan Cube could require 105 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Nissan Cube consumes 0.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Hyundai ix20. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 52 litres | 48 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 780 km in combined cycle | 810 km in combined cycle | |
| 920 km on highway | 920 km on highway | ||
| 700 km with real consumption | 660 km with real consumption | ||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 360'000 km | 280'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Nissan Cube engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 20 years | 19 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 8 other car models, including Nissan Qashqai, Nissan Almera, Nissan Juke, Nissan Note, Nissan Micra | Installed on at least 8 other car models, including Kia Ceed, Hyundai Elantra, Hyundai i30, Hyundai Accent, Kia RIO | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
| Nissan Cube 2010 1.6 engine: A simple and reliable engine, not particularly demanding on fuel quality. Tends to consume more oil, may have problems starting in cold weather. Hyundai ix20 2010 1.6 engine: Overall, the engine is reliable and not very demanding on fuel quality. Fuel injectors tend to be noisy. Timing chain resource is relatively low. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.98 m | 4.10 m | |
| Width: | 1.70 m | 1.77 m | |
| Height: | 1.67 m | 1.60 m | |
|
Nissan Cube is smaller, but higher. Nissan Cube is 12 cm shorter than the Hyundai ix20, 7 cm narrower, while the height of Nissan Cube is 7 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 255 litres | 440 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1563 litres | no data | |
|
Hyundai ix20 has more luggage space. Nissan Cube has 185 litres less trunk space than the Hyundai ix20. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.2 meters | 10.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Nissan Cube is 0.2 metres less than that of the Hyundai ix20. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`700 | 1`710 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Hyundai ix20 scores higher in safety tests. The Nissan Cube scores higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
| Quality: | no data | average | |
| Average price (€): | 5600 | 4800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Nissan Cube has
|
Hyundai ix20 has
| |